Introducing Private Voices

Private Voices is the offspring of the Corpus of American Civil War Letters (CACWL) project. Michael Ellis of Missouri State University and Michael Montgomery of the University of South Carolina began the project in the summer of 2007 with the aim of seeking and transcribing letters written during the Civil War to gather evidence of regional American English in the 19th century. As of May 2017, the project has amassed close to ten thousand letters and diaries written by common soldiers and their families from all parts of the country during the conflict.

We launch Private Voices with transcriptions of nearly 4,000 letters from four Southern states: North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama. This website has been made possible through the efforts of Stephen Berry and his team at ehistory.org at the University of Georgia. In the near future we plan to add letters from several Northern states, as well as additional Southern ons. The name Private Voices has a two-fold meaning. The majority of the letters in the project were written by privates in either the Union or Confederate Armies. In another sense, these letters are private. They were never intended for the larger audience they now have, but were private and personal missives written for family members or others known by the letter writers. These letters bring the often unknown or rarely heard voices of rank and file soldiers and their loved ones to life. In them one reads and hears their uncensored thoughts and feelings.


Besides the letter transcriptions, we have created two sections dealing specifically with language: “Camp Talk” and “Word Maps.” To see search terms in context, use the simple search feature. You can also browse the CACWL by archival collection and by letter writer. Mapping tools are not available at this time, but we will be adding them soon.

Why would two linguists be so interested in tracking down Civil War letters and have spent ten years doing this? Linguists are interested in studying speech, and letters of Civil War privates come much closer to everyday speech and reveal more about American English and its varieties in the 1860s than any other documents. The sheer numbers written by soldiers (and to a lesser extent by family members on the homefront) were unprecedented in American history. Approximately three million soldiers served in the Union or Confederate armies. Most were away from home for the first time and found themselves yearning for news and eager to share their experiences, however mundane or repetitive those might be. In short, they were lonely and expected that the more letters they wrote, the more letters they would receive in return. Many soldiers became steady correspondents for the first time in their lives, often writing home weekly while in camp. Their families and descendants preserved innumerable letters and later gave them to archives, where we have found them. CACWL has been interested in only a fraction of them, because the great majority of surviving letters were written by soldiers who were too literate, too “educated” to be of much value to us. However, there are countless others by marginally literate soldiers and their families–from both the South and the North–whose speech patterns can be recovered to varying degrees in their writing.


Wrenching Experiences

Just as the American Civil War formed the most powerful series of events in the history of the country, it was equally profound and devastating for soldiers and their families. Because it tore at the bonds between so many people, any documents relating to the war have been more likely to be preserved by descendants. Though many were once only private keepsakes and heirlooms, especially in the families of several hundred thousand soldiers who never came home, innumerable letters have more recently found their way into libraries and archives for researchers. CACWL has sought letters of the little-educated privates who were writing not for posterity, but to keep close to family and friends, to dispel their home-sickness, and to follow events they were missing. They were often so desperate for any news from home that, despite their lack of education, they were prompted, in fact were compelled, to write no matter how rudimentary their skills. If not for the painful separation, many would probably have never written a letter in their lives. Letters from privates differ from those of officers in their perspectives on such daily experiences of war as morale, disease, and the privations of poor food, shelter, and clothing, as well as sheer loneliness and other raw emotions. In so doing, they are frequently more powerful than ones by educated counterparts.


Unconventional Writers

The majority of letters collected for CACWL were penned by individuals who often did not feel constrained to follow conventions of punctuation, capitalization, or spelling. Rather than by anything learned in the schoolroom, they tended to write “by ear,” as for example did one soldier who spelled amongst as amunxt–which is such an odd-looking form until it is read aloud. Their inconsistent spellings and lack of punctuation such documents vividly display their writers’ lack of formal schooling and their reliance on spoken language. So does their use of non-standard grammatical forms. This reliance is seen even in common, formulaic phrasings of introductions and closings of letters, which writers have clearly memorized from hearing letters read aloud in camp or from their family circle before the war. Even in these one finds frequent misspellings, typified by “I am well at the present time hoping when those few lines Comes to yore hands they my find you Well and harty.”


A Key to Dialects

Letters like those transcribed by CACWL is an invaluable source of information about American English as it was spoken a hundred and fifty years ago. Thus, the transcriptions included at this website should be of interest to many kinds of historians, including language historians.


The Transcriptions

To ensure accurate transcription we at CACWL have transcribed documents ourselves from photocopies, microfilm, or digital images of original manuscripts whenever possible. So far, over nine thousand letters have been transcribed directly from these formats, mainly by Michael Ellis and his students at Missouri State University. Obtaining images has required considerable travel to archives and libraries. For example, Ellis has made four trips to photograph the extensive collections at the Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscript Library at Duke University and three trips to photograph letters and diaries at the U. S. Army Military History Institute at Carlisle, Pennsylvania. The preparatory work in accumulating and transcribing documents exhibiting such minimal literacy is painstaking and sometimes frustrating. Besides information about letter writers gathered onsite, we have also used census and military records to find out as much as we can about who these people were and where they lived, as well as basic information about ages, occupations, families, and socio-economic status. The transcriptions are as faithful to the originals as we could make them and have retained all original spellings, punctuation, and capitalization. Editing is minimal except for occasionally supplying a missing word or letter in brackets.


Our Research

Ten years ago when we began CACWL, there were relatively few images of Civil War letters available online. Now, by means of what are generally called “digital initiatives,” a growing number of institutions have made available high-quality images of Civil War letters and diaries. Among those we have used are websites at Auburn University, the Indiana Historical Society, Michigan State University, the University of Iowa, and the University of Vermont. In addition to transcribing letters from some of these online resources, over the last two years we have searched through nearly 1,700 letters, locating examples of important words and grammatical features and extracted citations exhibiting these.

Besides the obvious linguistic significance of the letters, we hope that they will be of significant value to, among others, historians and genealogists. Although our efforts so far have concentrated mainly on collecting and transcribing letters, the CACWL project has resulted in two recent articles in American Speech (the journal of the American Dialect Society), several conference presentations, and the book North Carolina English, 1861-1865, A Guide and Glossary (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2013) edited by project co-director Michael Ellis. Moreover, the two project directors are each preparing book-length studies which draw partly or entirely on linguistic evidence contained in Civil War letters.


The Work of Historians

Since the pioneering work of Bell Irvin Wiley (The Life of Johnny Reb, The Life of Billy Yank) more than sixty years ago, historians have undertaken considerable research using primary sources, including letters and diaries, to help them understand what it was like to be a “common soldier” during the Civil War (see for example Reid Mitchell’s “Not The General But The Soldier” in Writing the Civil War, The Quest to Understand, edited by James M. McPherson and William J. Cooper, Jr., Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1998). Works of historians have led us to numerous manuscript collections, and we trust that the letters in CACWL will in turn provide and promote new sources of information for future generations of historians to consult and analyze.

A project like this one relies, more than anything else, on the generosity and cooperation of archives and special collections libraries in the institutions throughout the country that hold manuscript documents. It is they, their staffs, and their supporting administrations who provide copies, lend microfilm, and allow us first–hand access to their collections.


Reading the Letters

The letters we have transcribed retain there original spelling and punctuation. As much as possible, we have kept their original format and have corrected nothing. It is sometimes problematic to make sense of letters with seemingly haphazard spelling and grammar, so we advise reading them aloud, just as recipients did a hundred and fifty years ago, as the best way to make sense of them.

Actually, the spelling is not as haphazard as it may at first seem. There are numerous spellings influenced by pronunciation and the spelling is often somewhat phonetic, but most writers made at least some attempt to follow standard spelling as they knew it. One of the more noticeable features in the letters is the confusion caused by homophones, words that sound alike but have different spellings, such as close/clothes, no/know, right/write, there/their, to/too/two, wood/would, and so on.

In the future we plan to add more information about letter writing that can for the present be found in Ellis (2013).


Editorial Method

If a word or part of a word cannot be read, angle brackets and a question mark ( [?] ) are used to indicate something that is illegible with the approximate number of letters indicated with question marks. Conjectural readings are indicted with the reading followed by a question mark in square brackets ( [word?] ). Missing letters or words are supplied within square brackets ([word]) if the these are likely to confuse the reader. Difficult words, readings, and comments, including identification of individuals mentioned in the letters, are given in notes at the end of a letter. Words that are crossed out in the original but can still be read are indicated with a strike-through (word). Crossed words that can't be read are ignored.

NEXT: Common Soldiers and Plain Folk

Get in touch

  • Department of History
    220 LeConte Hall, Baldwin Street
    University of Georgia
    Athens, GA 30602-1602
  • 706-542-2053
  • history@uga.edu

eHistory was founded at the University of Georgia in 2011 by historians Claudio Saunt and Stephen Berry

Learn More about eHistory